Main menu


What are the types of damages in personal injury cases?

What are the types of damages in personal injury cases?

The damages in a personal injury case will for the most part be compensatory. Compensatory damages are simply to compensate. 

So it would be for any pocket money that you have spent or that you can prove that it will be necessary to spend in the future. 

In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded. Punitive damages serve as a deterrent to repeating the behavior or negligence that caused the problem. 

If the court concludes that a party deserves to win the case, but has only a nominal monetary loss, nominal damages can be awarded. Nominal damages are only nominal. 

The amount granted is usually something minimum like $1 or something like that. The last possible award would be the award of attorney's fees. 

This is something rare and there are usually only specific circumstances for which a party can obtain attorney's fees. 

Some special circumstances related to fraud there may be multiplied amounts of certain rewards, but this is something that you will have to check or that your lawyer will manage. 

The amount of compensation may also depend on whether you live in a state of contributory negligence or comparative negligence..etc

Throughout the United States, there are four systems used to establish damages: pure contributory negligence, pure comparative negligence, modified comparative negligence-50% bar rule and modified comparative negligence-51 bar rule% 

Pure contributory negligence is still only used in 5 states. I know the District of Columbia uses it, but I don't know where else. 

The rule is that if you contributed to your injuries in any way, you cannot recover the damages even if the other party was mainly at fault.

In a state of comparative negligence, a person can recover the percentage of fault from the negligent party. (This is a determination of the facts for the jury or the investigator). 

So if you were 90% at fault but the other party is 10% and you receive $100 in compensatory damages, the other party would pay $10. There are no more states that use a pure comparative fault rule.

Some states use a modified version of the comparative fault rule. The first is the 50% rule (12 states use it). 

This rule allows recovery as long as the distribution of faults for the injured party does not exceed 49%. If you are half to blame, you may not get over it.

The other way to use the comparative fault is the 51% rule. This rule will allow the injured party as long as the amount of the fault attributed to him does not exceed 50%. Once it is 51% or more, the party can no longer recover the damages.

If there is more than one defendant, the amount they pay depends on the distribution of the fault jointly, severally or if it is a joint liability.

Joint liability means that you can collect the full amount from one party, and each is responsible for the full amount of damage. 

Therefore, if the others cannot or do not want to pay, it would be the responsibility of the paying party to go after the others to recover their share of the damages paid by one of the parties.

You can not go after each game for the full amount. But the amounts can be divided according to who can pay and how much, regardless of the distribution of their fault. So, if you sue three parties and two go bankrupt, the third must pay the entire amount.

If there are several responsibilities, each party is responsible only for the amount of the fault that is specifically assigned to him. 

You can only search for the amount that corresponds to their fault percentage. So if you get $100 and sue two parties, part A being 70% at fault and part B being 20% at fault and you are 10% at fault. Party A will pay $70 and Party B will pay $20.

If you are in a state that uses joint and several liability sometimes called "all sums", a plaintiff can bring an action for damages against a party as if he were jointly and severally liable and it is up to the defendants to determine their respective proportions of liability and payment. 

This means that if the plaintiff sues a defendant and receives a payment, then this defendant must sue the other debtors for a contribution to their share of the liability.

Joint and several liability is most relevant in tort claims, in connection with which a plaintiff can recover all damages from one of the defendants, regardless of his individual share of liability. The rule is often applied in negligence cases, although it is sometimes invoked in other areas of law.

Can I handle my personal injury case myself?

Seriously,. There is a saying, the guy without the lawyer always loses. Without commenting on your specific situation, a case could be worth a lot more than you think. 

If there is lasting physical damage, loss of work, career delay, property damage and initial medical expenses could only be a problem. 

Your lawyers will advise you, but on the other hand, the pain and suffering, family problems and poor work performance could be too attenuated from the actual event to show it, and even if they were legally recognizable damages, a jury would be skeptical about it.

Knowing this, a defense insurance company will stand up, and insurance companies and their lawyers are usually calculating, heartless and ruthless. 

It's about achieving the financial goals to deny and downgrade the claims, they will use all possible procedural tricks that the law allows (and quite a few that are not) to delay, intimidate and discourage you. 

They could accuse you of faking things, dredging up bad results at work or drug use, accidents or enemies from your past, hiring detectives and trying to say that because you go to the gym or dance, you must not have a real injury. 

You would think that trying to be reasonable and get by without the lawyers would encourage good behavior on both sides, but no way. It's like putting down your bear spray and then asking the bear not to bite.

If your lawyer thinks this is an economically viable case, he will say so. If they agree to take it in an emergency, they will take a large percentage, but on average they justify more than their salary in terms of the bottom line for you. 

Accident victims rarely get rich or even get back to where they were before the accident financially (this is mostly a myth), but a good verdict or a more likely settlement can help people get back on their feet. If you don't like the first avocado, try a second one. 

The only difficult decision is that if you can't find a lawyer with whom you feel comfortable to take a case in an emergency, do you pay as you please? Most people can't afford it.

If and when you find a lawyer, listen to him. You are the consumer here and it is your case and your decision, but they are pros in this field and you are not. 

It is better not to do things on your own that could jeopardize the case, such as contacting the other party. 

It's like admitting things to a police officer, if it's good for your case, they'll ignore it, but if they can use it against you, they'll pounce on it. 

To be frank here, your message contains typos and grammatical errors. If you do this in a letter to the other side, they will think that you are naive and that they can take advantage of you.